Lomonosov Moscow State University, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics

CENTRE FOR PHOTONUCLEAR EXPERIMENTS DATA


Chart of nucleus shape and size parameters.


Description.



NUCLEAR QUADRUPOLE DEFORMATIONS

Electronic Chart of Deformation gives to one possibility to obtain in comfortable form (analogous to that of well-known Charts of the Nuclides) numerical information for various nuclear deformation parameters (quadrupole moment Q and quadrupole deformation parameter b2) for ground states of many nuclei and contains the data from three sources:

  • [1] S.Raman, C.W.Nestor, P.Tikkanen. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 78, 1 (2001). - Transition Probability from the Ground to the First-Excited 2+ State of Even-Even Nuclides - reduced transition probability B(E2)↑­ (0+ ® 2+) data;
  • [2] N.J.Stone, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 90 75(2005) - Table of data on nuclear magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments - quadrupole moment data;
  • [3] B.S.Ishkhanov, V.N.Orlin. Yadernaya Fizika, 68, 1407 (2005) - - quadrupole deformation parametrs calculated in the frame of model essence of which is obtaining of equilibrium nucleus shape from the conditions of minimization of single-particle energies sum.

Nucleus quadrupole deformation parameter
from its quadrupole moment.

Intrinsic quadrupole moment of evenly charged ellipsoid can be described by equation

Q0 = 2/5 Z (b2 - a2),

where b is large, and a is small ellipsoid axises.

Since quadrupole deformation parameter δ (degree of nucleus shape difference from sphere) can be written as

δ = 0.3 (b2 - a2)/2<r>2,

where average mean-squared charge distribution radius is equal to

<r2> = (b2 + 2a2)/5,

equation (1) would be the following

Q0 = 4/3 Z <r2> δ.

Hense, using experimental quadrupole moment values the nucleus quadrupole deformation parameter values δ could be calculated by the formula

δ = 0.75 Q0 /(Z <r2>).

Moment Q0 values were recalculated from static electric quadrupole moment Q values measured in laboratory system. It was supposed than near spherical nucleus shape vibrations amplitude is small in comparison to nucleus equilibrium deformation and therefore the equation

Q = Q0 (3K2 - I(I + 1))/((I + 1)(2I + 3)),

where I is spin of state studied - the member of rotational band based on nucleus ground state, K is I's projection on symmetry axis (the joint characteristics of all band members).

Value of <r2> was evaluated using the following expressions

<r2> = 0.6R02(1 + 10/3(p a0/R0)2)/(1 + (p a0/R0)2) (À ≤ 100),
<r2> = 0.6(1.2 A1/3)2 (À > 100),

which takes into account effects of light nuclei surface diffusion properties.

Parameters of radial Woods-Saxon potential form-factor

(R0 = 1.07A1/3 fm and a0 = 0.55 fm)

were obtained from the data on fast electrons scattering.


Nucleus quadrupole deformation parameter
from the value of reduced transition probability B(E2)­ for (0+ ® 21+) transition.

Nucleus quadrupole deformation parameter was obtained using the following equation

b2 = (4p /3 Z R02)[B(E2; 0+® 21+)/e2]1/2,

where B(E2; 0+®21+) is reduced probability for Å2- transition from ground 0+ to first excited 2+1 state and R02 = (1.2 A1/3 sm)2.

δ ≈ 0.95b2.


Chart of Nuclear Quadrupole Deformations structure.

Default the data from all information sources used are presented; if it is needed the data presentation of any type could be switch out using the buttons of panel displayed under the Chart.

The four scales are used in the Chart, the panel “Fast Search” is intended to mark the proton number Z and neutron number N for concrete nucleus looked for.

With the aim of simplifying of searching and identification of data for looked for nucleus (or nuclei group) the special colors are used (in a manner similar to that for traditional geographical maps) - brown (“mountains”) - for nuclei with positive deformation, blue (“oceans”) - negative, and green (“plains”) - for nuclei with unknown sign of deformation or with zero deformation.

5 color intensity degrees identify the parameter of deformation absolute values – more intensive color corresponds to larger value.

After the click on the looked for nucleus Chart element using the smallest Chart scale all quadrupole moment Q and quadrupole deformation parameter b2 values correspondent to marked before information source (sources) together with data for energy and spin-parity for correspondent nucleus levels are presented in the additional window.





NUCLEAR RADII DATA

NUCLEAR CHARGE RADII – 2008

Yu.Gangrsky and K.Marinova*)
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141 980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia
*) e-mail: marinova@nrmail.jinr.ru

This table is a result of a combined analysis of two types of experimental data on nuclear charge radii. The first type yields data on rms charge radii R = <r2>1/2 from electron scattering experiments (el) and muonic atom spectra (mu) and the second - on ms charge radii changes δ<r2> from optical isotope shifts (OIS). The <r2> is root-mean-square radius. The combined treatment is applicable to those elements for which both types of data exist. Since the absolute radii R are known only for the stable isotopes, the extension of the neutron number far off stability is determined by the range of δ<r2> data. Thus, the table presents a new set of nuclear radii covering 59 elements from He to Cm (809 isotopes).

The least-squares method for the combined analysis described in detail in [Na94] remains unchanged. The updated values of nuclear charge radii in the present table differ from those in [Na94] due to changed input data on R and δ<r2>. The following should be noted:

  1. Now, the main source for the R values is the table of [An99]. The few exceptions are displayed in the reference list (see the comments below).
  2. In the most cases, original papers on optical isotope shifts instead of review papers are used and treated with the necessary precaution. In the procedure of extracting the nuclear parameter λ, the semiempirical approach using optical information was preferred. Experimental λ were converted in δ<r2> values using the corrections for the higher-order radial moments given by [Fr04]. References for the input data on δ<r2> are pointed out for each isotope in the table.
  3. Since 1994 many new optical data on radii changes have been published. In the present table more recent data, including early 2008, are taken into account.

Comments

  • For nine elements (Ca, Kr, Sr, Zr, Mo, Sn, Sm, Gd, and Pb) the R-values in the table of [An99] are obtained taking into account the experimental results from optical isotope shifts, too. To ensure correct analysis of both type of experimental data, nonopical (el-mu) and optical (OIS), another sources of rms radii R have been used in these cases [An08, Wo81].
  • For the radioactive elements Po, Rn, Fr, Ra and Cm there are no experimental R data. Reference radii R0 for an appropriated chosen isotope in the isotopic sequences of these elements are calculated by equation (22) of [An99] using the parameters of [An08].

Acknowledgment: The authors are indebted to I.Angeli for supplying additional information on rms charge radii R and for the helpful discussion.



REFERENCES

[An99] I.Angeli, Table of nuclear root mean square charge radii, INDC(HUN)-033, September 1999 (IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna).

[An08] I.Angeli, private communication (2008), Kr, Sr, Zr, Mo, Sn, Sm, Gd, Pb, 202Po, 212Rn, 212Fr , 214Ra, 244Cm, Th, U, Pu.

[Fr04] G.Fricke, K.Heilig, Landolt-Bornstein: Num. Data and Funct. Relat. in Science and Tech. New Series, Group I: Elem. Part., Nuclei and Atoms, v. 20 (2004).

[Na94] E.G.Nadjakov et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 56 (1994) 133.

[Wo81] H.D.Wohlfahrt et al. Phys. Rev. C23 (1981) 533, Ca.



RECOMMENDED VALUES OF NUCLEAR CHARGE RADII - 2008"

I. Angeli
Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Debrecen,
H-4010 Debrecen, Pf. 105.
E-mail: angeli@tigris.unideb.hu
Recommended values of nuclear charge radii 2008

The present table contains 865 rms nuclear charge radii. For absolute R values experimental data from electron scattering (e-), muonic atom X-rays (μ-), as well as Lamb shift (for the proton) were taken into account. For differences δR, in addition to e- and μ-, data from Ka isotope shifts (KIS) and optical isotope shifts (OIS) were used. Constraints between δR and R values were exploited wherever possible. Therefore, this table is not a simple compilation of individual measurements, but rather a more or less consistent set of R values.

The data sources and treatment has been described in detail in [An99] for the R values from e and μ  methods, while in [An04] the treatment of differences δR is given. Here only the changes are briefly mentioned. New data: the reference list presents the sources of data, published or found since the previous table. Change in the evaluation: for the absolute R data from e and μ methods, the simpler and more transparent averaging formulae were used (EXCEL) instead of the lengthy (FORTRAN) procedure, see Chapter 4. in [An99]. This resulted in small changes in the mean R values. The procedure for constraints and for assembling the isotopic wings to the backbone along the stability line remained as described in [An04].

 

Acknowledgement

The author is indebted to Yury Kozhedub (St. Petersburg State University) for the helpful criticism regarding the evaluation of uranium charge radius data.

 

 

Remarks

1) For the neutron the  <r2>  value is given in fm2.

2) For the proton radius the Lamb shift and the constraint with the deuteron radius are also taken into account; see the references and data in the second paragraph of section 2.1 (p.187) of [An04].

3) For He and Li the OIS experimental technique is accompanied by recent high-precisity theoretical calculations, resulting in a practically new method of δR determination; see also the respective references.

4) For Eu, there are two reference nuclei: A0 = 145 and 151.

5) For Er, there are two reference nuclei: A0 = 150 and 166.

6) For Re, Po, Rn, Fr, Ra and Cm there are no experimental R data. Reference radii R0 are calculated by the formula

with the parameters:  r0 = 0.9071(13) fm,  r1 = 1.105(25) fm,  r2 = ‑0.548(34) fm, which are the results of a least-squares fit to radii along the line of stability, see table 2. in [An04]. These parameters are not independent. Therefore, - to be on the safe side -, for the error the value 2×(ΔR0,ind) was used, where ΔR0,ind  is the value calculated by the assumption of independent parameters.

 

References

Hu61   Hull, R.J., and Stroke, H.H.: J. Opt. Soc. Am., 51 (1961) 1203Tl
Go69    Goorvitch, D., et al.: Phys. Rev., 188 (1969) 1897Tl
Fo82    Foot, C.J., et al.: Proc. Roy. Soc (L.), A384 (1982) 205Zn
Dy85   Dyer, P., et al.: Phys. Rev., C31 (1985) 240Sm
Al88b   Alkhazov, G.D., et al.: LNPI Preprint No. 1417 (1988) 20Gd
Bo89    Borchers, W., et al.: Physics Letters, B216 (1989) 7(Data included in Ot88)Xe
En90    England, J.G., et al.: J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 16 (1990) 105Sm
Sc91    Schulz, Ch., et al.: J. Phys. B.: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 24 (1991) 4831Yb
Le92    Letokhov, V.S., et al.: Journ. Phys. G18 (1992) 1177(From Ba04) Eu, Sm, Nd
Li92     Lievens, P., et al.: Phys. Rev., C46 (1992) 797Sr
Li96     Lievens, P., et al.: Europhysics Letters, 33/1 (1996) 11Kr, Sr
Ve96   Vermeeren, L., et al.: Journ. Phys. G22 (1996) 1517Ca
El98     Elliott, S.R., et al.: Phys. Rev. C57 (1998) 583U
 
An99   Angeli, I.: Table of Nuclear Root Mean Square Charge Radii, INDC(HUN)-033, Sept. 1999
(IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Vienna). Available also at <http://www.nds.iaea.or.at/indc-sel.html>.
 

An04   Angeli, I.: Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 87 (2004) 185(Table)
Ba04    Barzakh, A.E., et al.: Eur. Phys. J. A22 (2004) 69Eu
Ew04   Ewald, G., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  93 (2004) 113002(See Ew05, Nö05a) Li
Ga04    Gangrsky, Yu.P., et al.: J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 30 (2004) 1089Ti
Wa04   Wang, L.-B., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  93 (2004) 142501He
 
Ba05   Barzakh, A.E., et al.: Phys. Rev., C72 (2005) 017301Gd
Dr05    Drake, G.W., et al.: Can. J. Phys., 83 (2005) 311He (Δ<r^2> in Mu07), Li
Ew05   Ewald, G., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  94 (2004) 039901(Erratum to Ew05) Li
LB05   F.LeBlanc, et al.: Phys. Rev. C72 (2005) 034305Sn
Nö05   Nörtershäuser, W., et al.: Eur. Phys. J. A25 (2005) 199(See Nö05a) Li
Nö05a  Nörtershäuser, W., et al.: Hyperfine Interactions, 162 (2005) 93Li
 

Ga06   Gangrsky, Y. et al.: Hyperfine Interactions, 171 (2006) 209Sc
Mo06   Morton, D.C., et al.: Phys. Rev., A73 (2006) 034502He
Sá06    Sánchez, R., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  96 (2006) 033002Li
Sá06a  Sánchez, R., et al.:  Hyperfine Interactions, 171 (2006) 181Li
Se06    Seliverstov, M., et al.: Hyperfine Interactions, 171 (2006) 225(results in DW07)Pb
Si06     Sifi, R., et al.: Hyperfine Interactions, 171 (2006) 173.Te
Pu06    Puchalski, M., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  97 (2006) 133001(Theor. eval. of Sá06, Ri94) Li
Ve06   Verney, D., et al.: Eur. Phys. J., A30 (2006) 489Ir
 

Ch07   Cheal, B., et al.: Physics Letters, B645 (2007) 133Y
DW07  De Witte, H., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters,  98 (2007) 112502Pb
Ko07   Kozhedub, Y.: Private communication (2007)U
Li07     Libert, J., et al.: Nucl. Phys., A786 (2007) 47Te
Mu07   Mueller, P., et al.: Phys. Rev. Letters, 99 (2007) 252501He
Ro07    Roussière, B.: Private communication (2007)Te
 

Bl08    Blaum, K., et al.: Nucl. Phys., A799 (2008) 30Ar
Fe08    Fedorov, D.: Private communicaton (2008)Gd
Ma08   Marinova, K.: Private communication (2008)Ar, Sc
 

 

If you have any questions, comments, and/or suggestions, please, contact
CDFE Head: Vladimir V. Varlamov